2 ms·
It's a rabbit hole around the word "repatriate" in the article. The U.S. subsidiary appears to have entrusted the funds to someone else. The SEC apparently want
by unyttigfjelltol 3y ago
It's a rabbit hole around the word "repatriate" in the article. The U.S. subsidiary appears to have entrusted the funds to someone else. The SEC apparently wants the U.S. subsidiary to repatriate those funds, the details of course being very important.