3 ms·

You make a very good point, I’m going to stick with the grifter/liar/mentally ill thesis instead.

• Loquebantur 3y ago
  His actions would have seriously bad consequences for him if he was lying. Several reputable people have gone on record testifying for his (mental) integrity. Even some scientists actually. The whole premise of that guy being easily discredited is absurd. Its lazy thinking plain and simple. Go read the actual article and corroborating information on 'The Debrief'.
  • nonethewiser 3y ago
    His actions would have far worse consequence if he was telling the truth. If he is lying there is no conspirators to give a shit. Neither of these point to whether or not hes lying though. Just saying.
  • deleted 3y ago
    [deleted]
  • quickthrowman 3y ago
    Given the choice between ‘a guy is lying/mistaken and so are a few others’ and ‘a worldwide conspiracy has existed for 80 years to cover up the existence of alien visits to Earth’, I’m going to apply Occam’s Razor and go with lying.