5 ms·

GP expressed an opinion about abusive moderators. Your response is to disagree with him, identify yourself as a moderator, and then... be abusive? How exactly

• btreecat 3y ago
  [flagged]
  • nonethewiser 3y ago
    But there could be a mod problem and a problem with regular users. You seemed trapped in some tug of war.
  • biorach 3y ago
    > IDK how you think this is abusive I'm not the person you're replying to I don't think "abusive" is quite the right word for your tone. > you're clearly one of the folks who was a problem if that's your opening position ... You comment is v clearly just ignorant. "Rude", "abrasive" and "confrontational" are probably better fits. And I think you have a God given right to be as obnoxious as you feel is fitting in response to someone you disagree with with. But maybe that's not conducive to a healthy Reddit
  • mvdtnz 3y ago
    > IDK how you think this is abusive Let's have a look at some of the adjectives you have used, directed at people in this thread, Noisy nonsensical ridiculous silly a problem ignorant
    • btreecat 3y ago
      If the shoe fits buddy. It's not abusive to call a "squeaky wheel" "noisy" when that's what it is. When some one is ridiculous, it's fair to point it out, just as you are being nonsensical in this list of examples. Ignorant means you just don't know. I am plenty ignorant about many things, modding a fairly popular and large sub is just not one of them. Emotionally charged, sure abusive? lol