3 ms·
Crimea has survived without water for years previously. Russia may have determined that the expense of some aquaducts across the Kerch Strait is less than the e
by dralley 3y ago
Crimea has survived without water for years previously. Russia may have determined that the expense of some aquaducts across the Kerch Strait is less than the expense they may incur from a successful Ukrainian crossing of the river.
Or they may have determined they are likely to lose Crimea anyway and are salting the earth behind them.
This is to say, there are plenty of reasons why they may feel motivated to do this. Furthermore they destroyed another smaller dam in Eastern Ukraine only about 2 weeks ago.
- Scoundreller 3y agoThey may not “need” the water for drinking, but it looks like it supports a lot of crop irrigation.
- pmontra 3y agoIt does not seem that Russia ever cared about the wellbeing of the territories they occupy.
- The_Colonel 3y agoThe canal was not working until last year. It's questionable how much agriculture has been revived in that time.