4 ms·

So, Google agreed to make Flash on Linux available only via Chrome? Damn... But, if major Linux browsers implement Pepper API, on the other hand it will mean t

So, Google agreed to make Flash on Linux available only via Chrome? Damn... But, if major Linux browsers implement Pepper API, on the other hand it will mean that we (the users) won't have to bother installing (deb/rpm/etc) packages every now or then. Maybe it will turn out better.

rplnt 15y ago
I guess the Google is initiator of this project and thus won't care (will make adobe not care) about other browsers implementing this API. Just another step in pushing Chrome down everyone's throat.
pbhjpbhj 15y ago
So Google really are evil after all.
- ConceptJunkie 15y ago
  On the whole I don't think this is evil. More of a lateral move, morally. I can't imagine what Google hopes to accomplish with this since Flash is currently circling the drain, relevancy-wise, but if it does anything to hasten the move away from using Flash at all, then it's a plus.
  - coffeeaddicted 15y ago
    I think Pepper also supports their native client applications (x86 code which runs in a sandbox) and google probably would like to see that more used.
  - pbhjpbhj 15y ago
    So Google is not evil because forcing Adobe to remove flash support from other 'vendors' browsers is actually a good thing? Basically Google knows best and anyone who thinks that they might actually want to continue to use flash on Linux in a non-Google browser (or at least without installing Chrome) is wrong? This looks like the sort of heavy-handed monopoly activity that made Microsoft so great. It's possible that Adobe were intending to cease all Linux-based browser support and Google prevented that by buying back Chrome support; in which case Google has slipped in their PR big time.