3 ms·
I wouldn't say it's objectively stupid or inflammatory- rather it seems like a calculated risk. A lot of things shifted in the last year and it's clear now tha
by dekhn 3y ago
I wouldn't say it's objectively stupid or inflammatory- rather it seems like a calculated risk.
A lot of things shifted in the last year and it's clear now that Ukraine is using a wide range of options available to it- walking out progressively more aggressive responses, basically to test the russians and make the russian soldiers and leadership less confident in their approach. I imagine that they carefully watch the world's response to their actions, and adjust as necessary.
Those responses include tacitly supporting guerillas. Will the upcoming counteroffensive lead to Ukrainian troops entering the traditionally borders of Russia (not just occupied lands)? It seems unlikely. Will we continue to see guerilla action on the borders and possibly closer to home (Moscow)? It seems very likely.
Also, if the ukranians send nazi russians to russia to kill russians to stop the war, and the nazis get killed, that's a win for everybody, right?
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- lisasays 3y agoSo, if the ukranians send nazi russians to russia to kill russians to stop the war, and the nazis get killed, that's a win for everybody, right? Aside from the fact that they most likely won't (get killed) -- no, it's still not a win, or is it ever a win - to knowingly collaborate with committed Nazis for any tactical end, at any time. Trite as it may sound to some here.