3 ms·

Unless you had several co-morbidities, even the original variants of COVID weren't all that severe for most people. Per the CDC: > 146.6 Million Estimated Tot

Unless you had several co-morbidities, even the original variants of COVID weren't all that severe for most people. Per the CDC: > 146.6 Million Estimated Total Infections > 7.5 Million Estimated Hospitalizations > 921,000 Estimated Total Deaths https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/cases-updates/burden.html https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/cases-updates/burd... If memory serves, most of the panic in the early stages was really about the risk of overloading hospitals (which mostly didn't happen) and a lack of ventilators (which it turned out that ventilators made things worse for most COVID patients). COVID-19 itself wasn't extremely lethal at any point.

DiogenesKynikos 3y ago
> COVID-19 itself wasn't extremely lethal at any point. On a population level, it's the most lethal virus in the last 100 years. A virus that infects everyone and that kills 0.5-1% of those it infects is almost a worst-case scenario for public health.
- babyshake 3y ago
  Not trying to troll, but why wouldn't a virus that infects everyone and kills 5-10% or more be the worst-case scenario?
  - HWR_14 3y ago
    The idea is a 5-10% fatal virus would have far more severe social distancing and thus couldn't infect everyone. Otherwise, a "100% fatal, infects everyone" disease would be the worst case scenario.
    - ryandrake 3y ago
      I wish I believed you, but sadly I think we learned nothing from COVID and if version 2.0 happens and is 5-10% fatal, we would make the same mistakes all over again: ignore it, downplay it, politicize it, and then finally half-ass the fight with the same weak uncoordinated actions.
      - seanmcdirmid 3y ago
        The problem with COVID was that 70% of the deaths were in the 65+ range. So it didn't feel as severe to society as it would going by the death rate alone. We lost 3 years of life expectancy (it’s not clear if it will be recovered quickly or not), most people don’t think ahead that far so the problem feels abstract.

DiogenesKynikos 3y ago

> COVID-19 itself wasn't extremely lethal at any point. On a population level, it's the most lethal virus in the last 100 years. A virus that infects everyone and that kills 0.5-1% of those it infects is almost a worst-case scenario for public health.

babyshake 3y ago
Not trying to troll, but why wouldn't a virus that infects everyone and kills 5-10% or more be the worst-case scenario?
- HWR_14 3y ago
  The idea is a 5-10% fatal virus would have far more severe social distancing and thus couldn't infect everyone. Otherwise, a "100% fatal, infects everyone" disease would be the worst case scenario.
  - ryandrake 3y ago
    I wish I believed you, but sadly I think we learned nothing from COVID and if version 2.0 happens and is 5-10% fatal, we would make the same mistakes all over again: ignore it, downplay it, politicize it, and then finally half-ass the fight with the same weak uncoordinated actions.
    - seanmcdirmid 3y ago
      The problem with COVID was that 70% of the deaths were in the 65+ range. So it didn't feel as severe to society as it would going by the death rate alone. We lost 3 years of life expectancy (it’s not clear if it will be recovered quickly or not), most people don’t think ahead that far so the problem feels abstract.