Yes I saw that too, I wonder how this will play out with the ruling. This quote is very concerning: >That sets a precedent that if a union strikes, it has to

Yes I saw that too, I wonder how this will play out with the ruling. This quote is very concerning: >That sets a precedent that if a union strikes, it has to ensure the company won't lose any money. The whole point of a strike is to force profits of a company to go down so they will be able to be serious at the table.