2 ms·
Not sure I follow what you're trying to say. But the trials should end around the same time the manufactures can supply it. If you can manufacture a vaccine th
by lesuorac 3y ago
Not sure I follow what you're trying to say. But the trials should end around the same time the manufactures can supply it.
If you can manufacture a vaccine that you cannot sell then you have wasted production space. Like the trials had a pre-determined duration so if you know the trial ends in August and you know it takes 1 month to staff up the production line then at the end of June check the preliminary data and make a call to staff up the factory in anticipation of the trial succeeding.
But in order for the vaccines to be in a trial (testing) by March they had to have already been in development before March, I suspect a lot of these companies decided in like January/February to start staffing people to work on a vaccine; how and why would that have been faster if those federal people weren't fired?
- marcosdumay 3y agoYep, I was saying it seems that trials were shortened up until they took all the time manufacturers needed to produce the vaccines, and not any further because there was no point. That, of course was not clearly communicated, like everything else. So the OP's confusion of very small batches with industrial manufacture was excusable, but he is complaining about a wrong thing.