4 ms·
The claim was that AI currently surpasses human-performance on most tasks it's given, not that it can do an ok job on toy-level versions of those tasks. To loo
by gensym 3y ago
The claim was that AI currently surpasses human-performance on most tasks it's given, not that it can do an ok job on toy-level versions of those tasks.
To look at one of your examples:
> GPT-4 can write performance reviews given the right context.
The context is the performance review. Understanding what an employee has done relative to their responsibilities and goals is the entire point. Taking that context and packaging it into a review format (the thing an LLM could _maybe_ do adequately) is trivial compared to the observations and analysis that build that context.
- ilaksh 3y agoThese are _your_ examples. The claims that I responded to were the exact wording in your comment. If you wanted to make a different claim then you should have written that. It seems you want to modify your claim. In fact GPT-4 could make the observations and analysis to build that. I was using "context" in a technical way here. All I was stating was that it needs the data to be input in some way.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]