5 ms·

The upside from this downside is that it increases the performance of papers that can be replicated easily. In fact, once AI can replicate papers, that'll be he

by tikkun 3y ago

The upside from this downside is that it increases the performance of papers that can be replicated easily. In fact, once AI can replicate papers, that'll be helpful for verifying a lot of research.

deleted 3y ago
[deleted]
nradov 3y ago
How will AI be able to replicate papers?
- captainbland 3y ago
  This seems like a bleak dystopian fiction concept actually. AIs being in control of human experimentation on the basis of well meaning but poorly interpreted ethical guidelines (with, of course, fully hallucinated loopholes). Maybe add in that this has become one of the few sources of income for people as more and more jobs have been lost to the machines so many are compelled to participate.
  - samstave 3y ago
    "Take all the research done in [field] and compare the papers written by N authors, and look into their citations and compare the outcomes of what was published and find where the summation of the reads of their papers as shared citations and summarize the research where they agree, disagree and compare with international organizations and their papers coming from specifically the leads in this field from countries X,Y,Z" Create a paper based on this information and coalesce all this data into a new outcome. Do not Lie or make up data. list where you think you are lacking in data - or based on searching, which datasets or companies should be included in the list. Create a table for all the citations sourced, with links and a comment why it is or is not included in your findings" EDIT: Someone down voted this, and I am learning 'Prompt Engineering' - can someone ELI5 why this is a bad prompt? Seriously, can someone explain what sucks about the question? Is it a stupid premise or is the crafting of the prompt lame?
    - venv 3y ago
      What you are describing, is not replication.
    - yifanl 3y ago
      Physically repeating the experiments and independently verifying the data in the research is missing.
- dsr_ 3y ago
  The same way a Xerox machine does, but with different wording and randomly synthesized sources.
logifail 3y ago
> once AI can replicate papers Is this AI to be provided with a group of poorly-remunerated postgrads and postdocs and a laboratory full of relevant equipment in which they may conduct experiments under its direction? (Full disclosure: have a couple of very minor published papers obtained under the non-AI version of this exact system...)

by tikkun 3y ago

The upside from this downside is that it increases the performance of papers that can be replicated easily. In fact, once AI can replicate papers, that'll be helpful for verifying a lot of research.

deleted 3y ago

[deleted]

nradov 3y ago

How will AI be able to replicate papers?

captainbland 3y ago
This seems like a bleak dystopian fiction concept actually. AIs being in control of human experimentation on the basis of well meaning but poorly interpreted ethical guidelines (with, of course, fully hallucinated loopholes). Maybe add in that this has become one of the few sources of income for people as more and more jobs have been lost to the machines so many are compelled to participate.
- samstave 3y ago
  "Take all the research done in [field] and compare the papers written by N authors, and look into their citations and compare the outcomes of what was published and find where the summation of the reads of their papers as shared citations and summarize the research where they agree, disagree and compare with international organizations and their papers coming from specifically the leads in this field from countries X,Y,Z" Create a paper based on this information and coalesce all this data into a new outcome. Do not Lie or make up data. list where you think you are lacking in data - or based on searching, which datasets or companies should be included in the list. Create a table for all the citations sourced, with links and a comment why it is or is not included in your findings" EDIT: Someone down voted this, and I am learning 'Prompt Engineering' - can someone ELI5 why this is a bad prompt? Seriously, can someone explain what sucks about the question? Is it a stupid premise or is the crafting of the prompt lame?
  - venv 3y ago
    What you are describing, is not replication.
  - yifanl 3y ago
    Physically repeating the experiments and independently verifying the data in the research is missing.
dsr_ 3y ago
The same way a Xerox machine does, but with different wording and randomly synthesized sources.

logifail 3y ago

> once AI can replicate papers Is this AI to be provided with a group of poorly-remunerated postgrads and postdocs and a laboratory full of relevant equipment in which they may conduct experiments under its direction? (Full disclosure: have a couple of very minor published papers obtained under the non-AI version of this exact system...)