3 ms·
Agreed. I know Google is famously hard to get in touch with, but I don't understand how this fall on Google's plate or is really Google's fault at all. Maybe if
by nightpool 3y ago
Agreed. I know Google is famously hard to get in touch with, but I don't understand how this fall on Google's plate or is really Google's fault at all. Maybe if they shared some more info about what IAM group they created that managed to trick people into adding it Google could create rules to ban group names like that from being created?
- kadoban 3y agoIt's Google's fault because there's no "remove me from having access to this" button.
- hackernewds 3y agoif one is conscientious enough to report themselves be removed, they could also simply ignore the access
- kadoban 3y agoThere's liability in having access to some random crap, even if you don't intentionally use it. If something goes wrong, someone accesses or modifies something that they shouldn't have, you having access is going to be at _best_ confusing to everyone. At worst the cops or lawyers will come calling. Sure you'll _probably_ be able to talk them down, but does that sound like fun? Or what if someone breaks in to _your_ account and accesses that way? Untangling that mess will not be a good time.
- elzbardico 3y agoAnd let's say those firms are creating some shady stuff like Silk Road. You'd have a hard time explaining to the Feds that you appear as an administrator because of a mistake.