3 ms·
I studied civil engineering, with a focus on structural, but a heavy geotechnical element and some pavement design and rail desing. Highways are cheaper and ea
by 3pt14159 3y ago
I studied civil engineering, with a focus on structural, but a heavy geotechnical element and some pavement design and rail desing.
Highways are cheaper and easier because they're usually less investment and planning at once. They have their own downsides, don't get me wrong, but no. Rail is long term, lots of property seizure, usually a single track across a vast distance, etc.
Rail makes sense for a lot of places, but for a country as large as America, it's hard to see the benefits as fast as highways and we need logistics to switch to electric quickly.
That said, to make highways more efficient more places should take a page off of the 407 in Ontario, Canada. The fluctuating pricing keeps the roads in high usage most of the time and it stops tragedy of the commons issues with sinks (the cities that highways dump their vehicles to) and keeps highway economic pricing honest against things like rail and sea.
- aaomidi 3y agoWhat about starting to use the rails we already have?
- seanmcdirmid 3y agoAren’t most of our rails already used at capacity?
- bombcar 3y agoMuch of the US rail system sees one train each direction a day or less. The problem is those are feeder lines; the main lines can be at capacity even if they’re a relatively small percentage of the total rail.
- klyrs 3y ago> usually a single track across a vast distance, etc. This is fairly short-sighted, isn't it? Make no mistake, highways are also long-term and involve lots of property seizure. We could build out railways with more than a single track, but rail is private and roads are public.