2 ms·
Well, for us it's actually really cheap because we really just want the compute. The bandwidth is just a bonus. Actually, since the Akami acquisition it would
by winrid 3y ago
Well, for us it's actually really cheap because we really just want the compute. The bandwidth is just a bonus.
Actually, since the Akami acquisition it would be even cheaper.
$800/mo to serve 100TB with fairly high bandwidth and low latency from cold storage is a good deal IMO. I know companies paying millions a year to serve less than a third of that through AWS when you include compute, DB, and storage.
- qeternity 3y agoFine, but now you’re changing the comparison. Spending millions on compute with low bandwidth requirements doesn’t make it stupid. It probably still is, but that’s a different conversation.
- winrid 3y agolol no, it sure is. But OP didn't give a price range or durability requirements...