3 ms·
Exactly the reason I’ve half considered flagging the article. You remember the old meme, 1. A thing 2. ??? 3. Profit! This is sort of like that: TFA skips ove
by PeterWhittaker 3y ago
Exactly the reason I’ve half considered flagging the article.
You remember the old meme,
1. A thing
2. ???
3. Profit!
This is sort of like that: TFA skips over the part where the user is owned or conned by someone else.
The honest headline would be “yet another clever malicious thing you can do once you compromise someone else’s accounts!” but I can see where that would get fewer clicks.
- hxugufjfjf 3y agoIt's a persistence technique, see https://attack.mitre.org/tactics/TA0003/ https://attack.mitre.org/tactics/TA0003/
- PeterWhittaker 3y agoAbsolutely! In the meme, it would be step 3, profit/persist. You still need step 2, own. An even better headline, that would get even fewer clicks, would be "post compromise persistence technique using SSH authorized keys".
- hxugufjfjf 3y agoYes.