3 ms·
Honestly, I thought it was a pretty strong statement. They basically said "we screwed up."
by Wowfunhappy 3y ago
Honestly, I thought it was a pretty strong statement. They basically said "we screwed up."
- candiddevmike 3y agoThey used the words "stopped running" instead of "removed"...
- Aeolun 3y agoI mean, I wouldn’t expect them to be able to pull the whole thing out of the code at the drop of a hat.
- Zuiii 3y agoFor a browser that claims to be privacy focused, I would expect them to tightly contain the code in an external module that can easily be turned off. I would absolutely expect them to pull the whole thing out.
- lolinder 3y ago"Stopped running the ad experience" tells me the kind of language they've been using internally to describe projects like this, and it is not language that I'm okay with from Mozilla. Using the toxic language in the retraction doesn't breed confidence that they really understand what the error was.
- Waterluvian 3y agoIt’s not an “error,” it’s an “ad experience misadventure.”
- account42 3y agoThen you are either a fool or extremely naive. The statement they made actually says "we expected the frog to be more used to the heat by now and will try again later when it is".