3 ms·
> Do you need to know how fast I type before you run the calculation? I'll assume 100WPM, call that two words, billed at $200/hour and call that $0.06, falling
by MaulingMonkey 3y ago
> Do you need to know how fast I type before you run the calculation?
I'll assume 100WPM, call that two words, billed at $200/hour and call that $0.06, falling under "too cheap to be worth arguing against", which falls under the aforementioned:
>> If it'a a 5 second "this is probably the right choice" kneejerk reaction, maybe it's fine.
That said, there's a decent chance those 6 cents won't pay for themselves if this is a login on a single user system, with any theoretical benefits of O(...) scaling being drowned out by extra compile times, extra code to load - and I'd be plenty willing to NAK code reviews that merely attempt to replace /etc/passwd and /etc/shadow with this, as the extra time code reviewing the replacement still has negative expected ROI, and it'll be a lot more involved than a mere dozen characters.
Now, maybe we're attempting to centralize login management with Kerberos or something, perhaps with good reasons, perhaps which does something similar under the hood, and we could talk about that and possible positive ROI, despite some actual downtime and teething concerns?
- TylerE 3y agoNow document the two words, run the test suite to verify no-breakagem commit to source control, and push to production. Suddenly those two words cost a lot more than $0.06, and that's IF everything goes smoothly.