3 ms·

If you’re required to have it on you at all times outside of your own property then it is effectively no different to an arm tattoo.

• pbhjpbhj 3y ago
  You would not though, so it's not. You might as well say we should not have police because if they're required to beat you up if they saw you commit a crime then that would be bad. It would, but they're not, and it's the people who would intend that who you should oppose.
  • leadingthenet 3y ago
    > You would not though In several European countries, you absolutely do.
    • brigandish 3y ago
      It's sad that you have to post that comment. Should it surprise me that advocates of this do not know how ID cards are actually implemented, even in countries nearby?