4 ms·
I would argue that the 'Instant Ink' service as a whole is somewhat shady and an environmental disaster, but I agree that this particular part is an obvious out
by cmeacham98 3y ago
I would argue that the 'Instant Ink' service as a whole is somewhat shady and an environmental disaster, but I agree that this particular part is an obvious outcome that shouldn't really be controversial.
- __del__ 3y agoit isn't controversial that a company would rather destroy a resource than let someone have it, but some of us strongly oppose this
- WmWsjA6B29B4nfk 3y agoThey are not destroying any resources, you are free to cut the cartridge open and use the ink or electronic components as you like.
- toast0 3y agoDon't subscribe to the service if you don't like the business. HP certainly pushes instant ink, but afaik, all of the instant ink printers are also usable with customer owned cartridges (although some printers won't use 3rd party cartridges).
- Aeolun 3y agoI mean, I don’t. But I don’t think they should be allowed to something so senselessly wasteful at all. If the business doesn’t work without trashing perfectly good ink it shouldn’t be a business.