3 ms·
Indeed the actual point of the article seems to be: don't look at the limits-to-growth model's actual amazing ability to have put curves on a graph that 50 year
by polotics 3y ago
Indeed the actual point of the article seems to be: don't look at the limits-to-growth model's actual amazing ability to have put curves on a graph that 50 years later we are still following. Look at that one line that's still been going up for 50 years in reality (and is also going up in the model...) Then the "economist" chortles: how wrong could this model be, haha, hear hear!