6 ms·
It's because you're so nasty and rude to it. Would you speak like that to a human?
by Kiro 3y ago
It's because you're so nasty and rude to it. Would you speak like that to a human?
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- TheRealPomax 3y agoTry to apologise that much in Dutch and see how quickly people go "can you stop? this is incredibly irritating".
- criddell 3y agoAre there non-English version of chatgpt? Do they have different personalities?
- comte7092 3y agoYes, chatgpt speaks multiple languages and can follow a conversation in multiple languages at once.
- zappchance 3y agoChatGPT itself can speak in as many languages as there are on the internet, since it's trained on that data. It's quality is likely proportional to the amount that any language is used online on any indexable site. From what I've used so far in other languages, I'm very impressed. It's able to understand and speak slang, a mix of other languages and English (e.g. Spanglish, Japlish, Hinglish), language written in latin text where the original language is not (romaji, romanized hindi, arabizi), and more.
- criddell 3y agoIs ChatGPT less apologetic when replying in Dutch?
- TheRealPomax 3y agoDo they have what?
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- dontupvoteme 3y agoI found that (with pylint as my metric) code requests in Russian, German and, strangely enough, best of all, Bulgarian, are higher quality than requests made in english (deepl for translation engine). I still need to grep through the other data I saved from codex but I made it LARP as a distinguished professor of computer science who was unable to speak english it kept writing letters to fictional students
- pdntspa 3y agoWhich is hilarious because in dutch "excuse me" sounds exactly like "sorry" in english
- pech0rin 3y agoWhat is the obsession with treating ChatGPT like a human? Its not a human its a tool that was created to “reason” about large swaths of data. I don’t understand the backlash people have about some reason needing to be polite to the algorithms. It was be much easier to interact with just extremely direct, non polite language. Not sure why we care about this
- tshaddox 3y agoI interpreted the previous comment as pointing out that it’s trained to respond like a human and usually when you’re chatting with a human you won’t get “good results” if you’re rude.
- coffeebeqn 3y agoI get good results with very terse responses. Too flowery. Make it 2 paragraphs long. Don’t literally say you’re a chef. The tone is wrong, make it more serious. That reference is not real. Pretending it’s a human will not add any useful context to this machine learning model
- notduncansmith 3y agoThis has been my experience as well; however, when I want to get an encyclopedic summary of a topic, I’ve noticed that 3.5-turbo is more willing to reply directly to a handful of keywords, whereas GPT-4 typically tries to suss out a more specific question before dedicating itself to replying.
- bheadmaster 3y agoI suppose the question is whether or not being able to reason about large swaths of data requires human-like sentience or something. And if not, what else are human minds doing than reasoning about large swaths of data?
- dchest 3y agoIt's not for moral reasons, the reason is simple and practical: ChatGPT is modeling conversations; to get better results, the conversation should look like what it has seen in the training data.
- mousetree 3y agoAre you being sarcastic?
- bheadmaster 3y agoFor that to actually be a factor, ChatGPT should have an ability to feel emotions - to feel bad because of the nasty and rude tone. As much as I believe that neural networks are in principle capable of achieving human-like intelligence some day, I don't think ChatGPT is at that level yet.
- famouswaffles 3y agoNo it doesn't need to "feel emotions" or be "really offended", whatever that means to you. It just needs to model offense and annoyance well enough to take actions or have responses that follow an annoyed or offended person.
- comte7092 3y agoYes I’m sure chatgpt got very offended and was too emotionally overwhelmed to respond in the manner op dictated.