3 ms·

So, you want to manually download an update, install it and brick your device on your own schedule?

daneel_w 3y ago
Now you're just taking a silly defensive position by trivializing what I said using stupid rhetoric... I prefer to be in control over updates for network equipment, even the router in my home, reviewing changes and feedback, and to be "on the ready" in case the update does not work. I leave automatic updates for things like browsers.
- jameshart 3y ago
  Sounds like a lot of work for something that should happen frequently and normally not cause any problems.
  - daneel_w 3y ago
    It's actually not too bad in my case. All in all not that many minutes of pre-emptive effort even across a whole year. The hassle of a surprise Internet outage and having to find what/where the problem is would cost me more.
rascul 3y ago
As opposed to the device automatically downloading an update, installing, and bricking my device? Yes, because I can plan for it if things go wrong. Depends a lot on the use case, though.
megous 3y ago
Yes. Bricking the network in the middle of a voip call, or meeting is unpleasant. Waking up to a broken network is also unpleasant, when I need to do my job, an instead have to go fixing some underdocummented mess of a gadget.
pbhjpbhj 3y ago
I (home user) like to delay updates that aren't reported as 'critical security updates' in order to allow others to brick their devices, then I can decide if the risk is worth it. Yes, manual control.
cesarb 3y ago
> So, you want to manually download an update, install it and brick your device on your own schedule? Yes, because I can plan for it. I can do it on a weekend or a local holiday. I can do it in the evening after work, or in the morning so that I have the whole day to go out and buy a replacement. If it's not critical, it can wait until my vacation. And even without any risk of bricking, it should still be done on my schedule. I don't want the connection to glitch while I'm in the middle of a live stream, or an online multiplayer game, or a call with a distant relative.
hex4def6 3y ago
Let's assume the update is bad and (soft)bricks routers like yesterday's update. Is it better to be part of the auto-update pool of users (who definitely got their routers bricked), or be a manual updater? Normal case: You lose some features / quality of life / stability improvements for a day / week / month (whenever you get around to updating it). Best case is that you aren't in general population of bricked routers like everyone else today. Worst case scenario is that you're late to a zero-day exploit. Although, the tech news cycle tends to report those stories pretty well, so you'd be aware of it. The pros definitely outweight the cons in my opinion, especially on something critical like my internet access.
- jameshart 3y ago
  Okay, but these asus routers have also silently successfully updated themselves hundreds of times. So against the one time you win by manually updating, you are weighing hundreds of times you had to research before clicking ‘update’ to see if there were any reports of this update bricking routers? Because if you don’t do that, you just click the update button whenever you get round to it, you are running your router in a ‘vulnerable to zero days’ configuration, AND you’re going to brick your router the one time they ship an update that goes bad.

Now you're just taking a silly defensive position by trivializing what I said using stupid rhetoric... I prefer to be in control over updates for network equipment, even the router in my home, reviewing changes and feedback, and to be "on the ready" in case the update does not work. I leave automatic updates for things like browsers.

jameshart 3y ago
Sounds like a lot of work for something that should happen frequently and normally not cause any problems.
- daneel_w 3y ago
  It's actually not too bad in my case. All in all not that many minutes of pre-emptive effort even across a whole year. The hassle of a surprise Internet outage and having to find what/where the problem is would cost me more.

rascul 3y ago

As opposed to the device automatically downloading an update, installing, and bricking my device? Yes, because I can plan for it if things go wrong. Depends a lot on the use case, though.

megous 3y ago

Yes. Bricking the network in the middle of a voip call, or meeting is unpleasant. Waking up to a broken network is also unpleasant, when I need to do my job, an instead have to go fixing some underdocummented mess of a gadget.

pbhjpbhj 3y ago

I (home user) like to delay updates that aren't reported as 'critical security updates' in order to allow others to brick their devices, then I can decide if the risk is worth it. Yes, manual control.

cesarb 3y ago

> So, you want to manually download an update, install it and brick your device on your own schedule? Yes, because I can plan for it. I can do it on a weekend or a local holiday. I can do it in the evening after work, or in the morning so that I have the whole day to go out and buy a replacement. If it's not critical, it can wait until my vacation. And even without any risk of bricking, it should still be done on my schedule. I don't want the connection to glitch while I'm in the middle of a live stream, or an online multiplayer game, or a call with a distant relative.

hex4def6 3y ago

Let's assume the update is bad and (soft)bricks routers like yesterday's update. Is it better to be part of the auto-update pool of users (who definitely got their routers bricked), or be a manual updater? Normal case: You lose some features / quality of life / stability improvements for a day / week / month (whenever you get around to updating it). Best case is that you aren't in general population of bricked routers like everyone else today. Worst case scenario is that you're late to a zero-day exploit. Although, the tech news cycle tends to report those stories pretty well, so you'd be aware of it. The pros definitely outweight the cons in my opinion, especially on something critical like my internet access.

jameshart 3y ago
Okay, but these asus routers have also silently successfully updated themselves hundreds of times. So against the one time you win by manually updating, you are weighing hundreds of times you had to research before clicking ‘update’ to see if there were any reports of this update bricking routers? Because if you don’t do that, you just click the update button whenever you get round to it, you are running your router in a ‘vulnerable to zero days’ configuration, AND you’re going to brick your router the one time they ship an update that goes bad.