3 ms·
If I were being uncharitable, I'd say she had the kids to try and avoid going to jail. If she were a psychopath it's the sort of thing she might pull. On the ot
by drumhead 3y ago
If I were being uncharitable, I'd say she had the kids to try and avoid going to jail. If she were a psychopath it's the sort of thing she might pull. On the other hand it may have been the only opportunity to have kids if she knew she was going to go inside for a while, so she maximised her opportunity.
- klyrs 3y agoDoing whatever she wants out of self interest, and damn the consequences to those to who she's responsible for? Story checks out, but that's not much more generous.
- HelloNurse 3y agoIt looks like straightforward cost externalization: she achieved reproduction, the consequences of growing up without a mother are her children's problem, and the burden of raising them is distributed among other family members. By the way, is Elizabeth Holmes married? Whose children are they?
- orwin 3y agoAnother rich heir. They mostly reproduce with each other and with top sport/entertainment people, but her reputation made that only the first category is available to her.