4 ms·
I think it is quite possible the the buyer didnt do sufficient homework. It is also quite possible that the seller had reasonable grounds to think that everythi
by medo-bear 3y ago
I think it is quite possible the the buyer didnt do sufficient homework. It is also quite possible that the seller had reasonable grounds to think that everything is in order but got side swiped by German bureocracy. It is also possible that the buyer wanted to take advantage of a simple mistake and started yelling "fraud!". Maybe he would have fared much better had he saught legal advice before entering such a large financial commitment, and saved himself the time and effort of going to court.
- kioleanu 3y agothat is a truck-load of assumptions
- medo-bear 3y agopossibilities* yet accusation of fraud is not an assumption?
- Dylan16807 3y agoI think it's fair to say that an accusation in court is not an assumption, yes.
- medo-bear 3y agoyou must have an assumption in order to have an accusation, what's not clear?
- Dylan16807 3y agoSomeone bringing a suit will typically research things quite well and not have assumptions about core elements by the time they file. And sometimes there never was speculation at all. What do you mean "must"? More to the point, even if you want to call it an assumption a median lawsuit is a lot more thorough than something a commenter guesses offhand as they post. The two are leagues apart whether or not you use the same word.
- medo-bear 3y agoI don't think you know what assumption means. Let me help you out. He researched an asset so well he decided to purchase it without professional help. When it didnt go to plan he assumed the seller commited fraud. Based on that assumption he took them to court. He then reasearched his case so well that, by the sound of it, the judge laughed him out of the court with a personal anecdote. He then went to HN to bad mouth the judge assuming he is incompetant. So much reasearch. You sound like a professional accuser.