2 ms·
It does not. Interpretation can vary but thats not the same thing.
by nonethewiser 4y ago
It does not.
Interpretation can vary but thats not the same thing.
- reuben364 3y ago'can be considered "constitutional"' is a function of the persons interpretation. Is it not the case that whether a law passes is affected by the interpretations of 'can be considered "constitutional"' by the powers that can influence the outcome.
- wizzwizz4 3y agohttps://pluralistic.net/2023/03/25/consequentialism/#dotards-in-robes https://pluralistic.net/2023/03/25/consequentialism/#dotards... > For many Constitutional law scholars, last years' Dobbs decision on abortion rights at the Supreme Court came as a dismaying shock, because it showed conclusively that conlaw wasn't a realm of ideologically consistent intellectual foment, but rather, a matter of politics. > Writing for Credit Slips, the finance law scholar Adam Levitin admits to feeling a bit of schadenfreude in that moment. The "blue collar" law scholars in "grubby" banking and money fields have always treated the conlaw set as "slightly clueless toffs"