3 ms·
I used to read WSJ more often but their Op-Ed page has really gone off the deep end into Trump cheerleading which is not what I expected. My primaries are proba
by tootie 3y ago
I used to read WSJ more often but their Op-Ed page has really gone off the deep end into Trump cheerleading which is not what I expected. My primaries are probably NY Times and NPR really, but I like Axios and am watching Semafor with interest. Otherwise, I have a slate of indies I check in on (Marcy Wheeler and Claudia Sahm are always interesting), but I've genuinely lost some of that when I quit twitter. I like the CNN homepage just because it's so broad. Like I'll never seek out celebrity news, but it's good to see whatever has bubbled up to the top of the national consciousness.
I don't think the left can really support a true maniac on par with Tucker Carlson. They tried Air America with Al Franken years ago and it was not bad, but didn't resonate. I remember a host trying to say the 2004 election was stolen by Republicans and I just turned it off. Don't remember who it was, but she didn't get any traction reading from the right-wing play book.
- steveBK123 3y agoI don't mean the left needs a demagogue, I mean they need a business conglomerate to consolidate & compete. Another good alternative to WSJ is FT. FT & Bloomberg subscriptions cost about 10x what WSJ does though. For me I am happier paying for one (or both of them) + NYT, than 15 different NYT-alikes.
- FormerBandmate 3y agoNYT is by far the best at it. There’s a reason they’re not bankrupt and Vice is. Vice wouldn’t have gone bankrupt if they had stuck to their niche
- Melatonic 3y agoAP News with an adblocker is solid too - half the time everyone else is just referncing an AP article / journalist anyways! My go to is NPR, AP, and Al Jazeera for non US centric stuff. The left already has a liber version of Tucky - Bill Maher I guess?