4 ms·
>It didn't work, but it still generated it. So neither could generate the plugin, it's just that one of them lied about it.
by trasz4 3y ago
>It didn't work, but it still generated it.
So neither could generate the plugin, it's just that one of them lied about it.
- jeroenvlek 3y agoNo, I suspect it's more the case that ChatGPT could generate it anno 2021, but can't anymore due changes in Chromium (I switched to Edge ultimately) and the Gmail API and Google Cloud Credentials workflow that I tried to add to it later. It was interesting to see that ChatGPT annotated its code with pitfalls to avoid, that it actually didn't avoid in the code.
- trasz4 3y ago>No, I suspect it's more the case that ChatGPT could generate it anno 2021 Why? I mean, why does it sound more plausible to you that it ever could, when we have countless examples of models lying (or rather hallucinating)?
- jeroenvlek 3y agoBecause it was trained on old documentation, but I see your point. My original point was also not necessarily that ChatGPT was correct, but that ChatGPT at least gave something to work with, whereas Bard simlly refused.
- disgruntledphd2 3y agoJust like a real human;)
- badrequest 3y agoThe company I work for is building a browser extension that involves ChatGPT, and we can unfortunately confirm that it is, in fact, not capable of writing browser extension code.