4 ms·

Knowledge cut off and sending potentially sensitive IP to a centralised and untrusted third party. This would likely limit the addressable market.

jjoonathan 3y ago
Also: they are lobotomized. If you want to do security research, Sorry Dave. If you want to nsfw writing, Sorry Dave. If you want to open the pod bay doors, Sorry Dave, I'm afraid I can't do that.
- yieldcrv 3y ago
  I tried to help a sex worker with ChatGPT and all it did was preach about avoiding sex work, further marginalizing in its virtue signalizing. I dont consider her marginalized, and “help” was just information about her job and techniques and venues. ChatGPT would have consumed this textual information too. But yeah offline fine tuned models wont have this problem. Kind of cool to see how the SWERF representation in tech is going to speedrun SWERF irrelevancy.
  - jhartwig 3y ago
    You tried to help a sex worker with chatGPT? Care to explain more on this use case lol? Curious minds want to know.
    - yieldcrv 3y ago
      Venues to work, other people’s thoughts working there, management, nuances about local licenses, stuff that anybody with any job would do
    - jstarfish 3y ago
      People are already setting up fake personas/OnlyFans accounts using chatbots and SD images. We have a high-value specialist currently chatting up a few of them at work. His wife doesn't know. He doesn't know we know. The photos are fake but he's too horny to notice. Time to dust off the "there are no women on the internet" meme...
      - yieldcrv 3y ago
        Informative for some but this wasn’t an interaction over the internet, just out and about
      - baobabKoodaa 3y ago
        > People are already setting up fake personas/OnlyFans accounts using chatbots and SD images. Citation needed.
        yieldcrv 3y ago
        just the latest most high profile example making the rounds yesterday https://www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/rcna84180 https://www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/rcna84180
        baobabKoodaa 3y ago
        Your link does not support the claim I was asking the citation for. A chatbot service marketed as a chatbot service is distinctly different from a fake online persona constructed with chatbot and stable diffusion. In particular, the "honest chatbot" does not have anything to do with AI-generated images, and it's not purporting a fake persona.
        yieldcrv 3y ago
        ah okay, I wasn't responding to show catfishing occurring, and I was responding on the subject of a non-human adult content creator making money by entertaining humans. It wasn't clear to me that was your goal post as "fake" can be brevity and hyperbolic just as much as it can be about catfishing, and it also wasn't clear to me that the person you responded to was even pointing out anything relevant to this thread which was "casually talking in person with someone whose occupation is also sex work" being followed with "hey we have a guy at the office that thinks they're talking to sex workers! this person on hackernews must be a guy and just like him!" so at this point, I would say we're too far down to really be invested in these nuances, but I hope you find what you're looking for
- mycall 3y ago
  You are missing the point. There are layers and the LLM is one layer (orchestration), but you can always have other semantic kernels with skills connected to other software (do stuff).
  - ehnto 3y ago
    That is exciting to me, if a little scary. A home-AI or business-AI running entirely in house for privacy and security reasons. That is technically possible right now, but perhaps practically a little bit down the road yet.
- cubefox 3y ago
  Microsoft Azure still has the GPT-3.5 foundation model, code-davinci-002. It is not fine-tuned for instruction following, safety, or censorship. I'm not sure though whether Microsoft analyzes the input/output with another model to detect and prevent certain content.

jjoonathan 3y ago

Also: they are lobotomized. If you want to do security research, Sorry Dave. If you want to nsfw writing, Sorry Dave. If you want to open the pod bay doors, Sorry Dave, I'm afraid I can't do that.

yieldcrv 3y ago
I tried to help a sex worker with ChatGPT and all it did was preach about avoiding sex work, further marginalizing in its virtue signalizing. I dont consider her marginalized, and “help” was just information about her job and techniques and venues. ChatGPT would have consumed this textual information too. But yeah offline fine tuned models wont have this problem. Kind of cool to see how the SWERF representation in tech is going to speedrun SWERF irrelevancy.
- jhartwig 3y ago
  You tried to help a sex worker with chatGPT? Care to explain more on this use case lol? Curious minds want to know.
  - yieldcrv 3y ago
    Venues to work, other people’s thoughts working there, management, nuances about local licenses, stuff that anybody with any job would do
  - jstarfish 3y ago
    People are already setting up fake personas/OnlyFans accounts using chatbots and SD images. We have a high-value specialist currently chatting up a few of them at work. His wife doesn't know. He doesn't know we know. The photos are fake but he's too horny to notice. Time to dust off the "there are no women on the internet" meme...
    - yieldcrv 3y ago
      Informative for some but this wasn’t an interaction over the internet, just out and about
    - baobabKoodaa 3y ago
      > People are already setting up fake personas/OnlyFans accounts using chatbots and SD images. Citation needed.
      - yieldcrv 3y ago
        just the latest most high profile example making the rounds yesterday https://www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/rcna84180 https://www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/rcna84180
        baobabKoodaa 3y ago
        Your link does not support the claim I was asking the citation for. A chatbot service marketed as a chatbot service is distinctly different from a fake online persona constructed with chatbot and stable diffusion. In particular, the "honest chatbot" does not have anything to do with AI-generated images, and it's not purporting a fake persona.
        yieldcrv 3y ago
        ah okay, I wasn't responding to show catfishing occurring, and I was responding on the subject of a non-human adult content creator making money by entertaining humans. It wasn't clear to me that was your goal post as "fake" can be brevity and hyperbolic just as much as it can be about catfishing, and it also wasn't clear to me that the person you responded to was even pointing out anything relevant to this thread which was "casually talking in person with someone whose occupation is also sex work" being followed with "hey we have a guy at the office that thinks they're talking to sex workers! this person on hackernews must be a guy and just like him!" so at this point, I would say we're too far down to really be invested in these nuances, but I hope you find what you're looking for
mycall 3y ago
You are missing the point. There are layers and the LLM is one layer (orchestration), but you can always have other semantic kernels with skills connected to other software (do stuff).
- ehnto 3y ago
  That is exciting to me, if a little scary. A home-AI or business-AI running entirely in house for privacy and security reasons. That is technically possible right now, but perhaps practically a little bit down the road yet.
cubefox 3y ago
Microsoft Azure still has the GPT-3.5 foundation model, code-davinci-002. It is not fine-tuned for instruction following, safety, or censorship. I'm not sure though whether Microsoft analyzes the input/output with another model to detect and prevent certain content.