4 ms·
Moral relativism is ... human. Sure, it's hard to defend. But we embody it nonetheless. We're emotional creatures, we lack logical consistency in a fundamental
by pbhjpbhj 3y ago
Moral relativism is ... human.
Sure, it's hard to defend. But we embody it nonetheless. We're emotional creatures, we lack logical consistency in a fundamental way.
- visarga 3y ago> we lack logical consistency in a fundamental way ... and "AI's don't really understand" as people say So, in the end, is anyone/anything capable of reasoning? Probably only humans in their specific fields of expertise. Even then, we are often updating our reasoning patterns in light of new discoveries, upturning previous reasoning. 99% of the time humans are just GPTs with hands and legs generating untrustworthy logic.
- sebzim4500 3y agoI'm starting to think that chess engines are capable of reasoning but humans and LLMs are not.