4 ms·
No, not really. Paws kind of implies something that's fairly fleshy and soft and which bats don't have. Claws would be appropriate description of what bats ha
by scheme271 3y ago
No, not really. Paws kind of implies something that's fairly fleshy and soft and which bats don't have. Claws would be appropriate description of what bats have.
- seanmcdirmid 3y agoI saw a huge bat in Ubud Bali who was definitely eating a peach with their paws. I guess they were closer to hands? But definitely not claws.