Here's a much more interesting (popsci) article: https://www.nytimes.com/2021/07/08/science/cauliflower-fractals.html https://www.nytimes.com/2021/07/08/science

Here's a much more interesting (popsci) article: https://www.nytimes.com/2021/07/08/science/cauliflower-fractals.html https://www.nytimes.com/2021/07/08/science/cauliflower-fract... and the paper related to it: https://www.science.org/doi/full/10.1126/science.abg5999 https://www.science.org/doi/full/10.1126/science.abg5999 Note the comment at the bottom of the article (who is the author of the posted article) After reading a fair amount of this I'd conclude that the posted article doesn't really move science farther, it just acts as a pedantry gate.