9 ms·
its an actual explanation of the patent. but as if you were an alchemist. I thought it was funny.
by lordvivek 3y ago
its an actual explanation of the patent. but as if you were an alchemist. I thought it was funny.
- refulgentis 3y agoIt’s cool, I got -2’d and youre still up, I misread the room. Just hope it’s not the future here, no reason why other people shouldn’t post ones as a wizard, orc, crypto ceo…
- andrewchambers 3y agoIts getting down voted because if people want that sort of thing they can generate it themselves.
- refulgentis 3y agoThere's a sort of circular logic there: the alchemist one is fine because people wanted it, the other ones aren't fine because people don't want it. I prefer an HN that ends up skipping "explain [ARTICLE] as $X" altogether unless $X is on-topic
- boppo1 3y agoHonestly this kind of stuff is already boring. It's an extremely simplified explanation, and overall a pretty low effort post. Don't get me wrong, ChatGPT is amazing, and I had it write me some recipes in Plato's voice. But now the novelty has worn off and this is essentially throwaway content. It's not contributing anything to the discussion.
- hungryforcodes 3y agoWhy?
- bitL 3y agoIt's actually a pretty good ELI5 explanation of attention - "ingenious mechanism which illuminates certain symbols with a bright light"...