3 ms·

I think this is a conversation worth having, but personally I haven't made any decisions. There are a few interesting names on there though, from VOX, The New Y

I think this is a conversation worth having, but personally I haven't made any decisions. There are a few interesting names on there though, from VOX, The New York Review of Books, and In Our Times. I think the community just needs to be aware that these types of pushback are happening, esp in the light of the Writer's Guild strike. The timing has to be intentional. I love generative AI for ideation, esp around product design, but I don't think (at this point) I'd use any of what it generates as my final work anyway. But that's just me.

mdp2021 3y ago
The current stage is rough, while jaw-dropping in /apparent/ quality¹. When finally the synthesis will be part of an artistic tool (your usual raster and vector graphics editors), then it will be a further tool for the graphic artist. (¹The letter correctly almost suggests the crucial role of human intelligence in the product definition; I prefer to quote myself from https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33752684 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33752684 : «The visual style is stunningly good, but an unintelligent operation - it is relatively easy to mock a style, while the real thing was the judgement underneath. The Author knows if and why he would have used a curve made in such way in that place - not the simple mocker»)