4 ms·
The parent has a point, the regulation is forcing a slightly smaller battery, slightly less durable connector, much more expensive repairs when the port stem br
by MichaelZuo 4y ago
The parent has a point, the regulation is forcing a slightly smaller battery, slightly less durable connector, much more expensive repairs when the port stem breaks, etc.
For devices that doesn't need the extra capabilities.
- Jochim 4y agoPeople keep repeating this but how frequently do USB C ports actually break? Anecdotally, I had horrendous issues with mini USB but I've never had a micro USB or USB C port break. I'm not particularly gentle with them either, I've had the female end come out of the cable boot/snap off and the cable stop working due to strain on the boot. I don't know anyone who has experienced this personally and I can't recall seeing any anecdotes of it actually occurring in the HN threads where it's brought up.
- MichaelZuo 4y ago> People keep repeating this but how frequently do USB C ports actually break? Even if the real rate was only 1 in a thousand devices, that's still a serious burden for the unlucky few. Whereas for lightning connectors, it's trivial to dislodge.
- Dylan16807 4y agoYou need to look at overall failure rate, not just that one specific type of failure can only happen to USB-C.
- MichaelZuo 4y agoWhy?
- Dylan16807 4y agoBecause we're talking about which one is more durable.
- MichaelZuo 4y agoNo? The parent was clearly referring to the connector specifically not the overall durability of devices.
- Dylan16807 4y agoOh, that's the confusion. I mean the overall failure rate of the port.
- MichaelZuo 4y agoIn that case there's even less of an argument for USB-C ports since it's real world failure rate is much higher . Partly due to the increased complexity, partly due to the physical design, partly due to less stringent quality control, etc... If you assess failure rate based off whether it can reliably meet advertised claims year-after-year, such that a large degradation would count as failure, then I would dare say real world failure rate are dozens or hundreds of times higher than Lightning ports.
- Dylan16807 4y agoDo you have a source for those numbers?
- MichaelZuo 4y ago'dare say' usually means that the source is the writer.
- Dylan16807 4y agoYour first paragraph didn't have "dare say". And you can't just add that as a disclaimer to any factual statement to make you immune to needing evidence. If you made that guess based on how much you like the ports, then you're wasting everyone's time. But again, you said "real world failure rate is much higher" as a flat-out fact.