3 ms·
It's certainly an issue what goes into the life expectancy, but the question is whether that sort of thing makes sense. You could just say everyone is dumped in
by lordnacho 4y ago
It's certainly an issue what goes into the life expectancy, but the question is whether that sort of thing makes sense. You could just say everyone is dumped in one table with no conditionality and that is the life expectancy. Or you could take into account all sorts of features like gender, occupation, and so forth.
But it's the principle. I mean you could also just say each kid is a quarter vote, each retiree is a half.
Quizzes, yeah, I can see why people think it's a bad idea. But what's the solution to idiots voting? You want people to actually know what's in their interest. And I'm not looking at it from the perspective of any particular country that might have a history of voter suppression through qualifying tests. Just thinking out loud about what to do about this particular issue.
Kid dying before the election is no different from a candidate dying before the election. Or postal early voter dying. We can live with it.