3 ms·
If you cared to look thoroughly on the metrics of the journal you would see that its a well known journal in microbiology, with a fine performance. It might be
by tokai 4y ago
If you cared to look thoroughly on the metrics of the journal you would see that its a well known journal in microbiology, with a fine performance. It might be okay to dismiss a paper without reading it if its from one of the predatory publishers with +1000 journals and jpg artifacts in their page banner. But it is ridiculous to critic a pilot study with a small number of participants for not getting published in a very top journal.
Cargo culting the journal impact factor is so counter to what science is about, that its bewildering that it is so common.
- vibrio 4y agoAgreed. For young scientists, asking why the paper didn’t make it into a ‘better’ journal can be a good thought experiment, but dismissing it on the basis of impact factor is against the whole purpose of science.