3 ms·
No pal, I've no intention of 'reading the whitepaper'
by secondcoming 3y ago
No pal, I've no intention of 'reading the whitepaper'
- EGreg 3y agoWho said anything about reading a whitepaper?
- Dylan16807 3y agoAre you saying you can't figure out they mean your pdf?
- EGreg 3y agoThe PDF isnt even close to being whitepaper, so…
- Dylan16807 3y agoIsn't even close? The PDF is a summary/introduction for a whitepaper. The last page links to the whitepaper for more information. Using the word whitepaper. And you need to either go there or somewhere with the same content for a full understanding. Come on, work with people. It's very clear what they meant, and their wording is reasonable. I don't even need to go into how they were using quotes to be inclusive of things similar to whitepapers...
- EGreg 3y agoPresentstions that link to whitepapers are whitepapers And comments that make no sense are funny, because the author has the same bias Double standards for making sense are awesome
- Dylan16807 3y agoWhat's my bias? You're going out of your way to make this a communication problem when it was a really basic comment.
- EGreg 3y agoYour bias is that you are against Web3, so unfunny jokes and incorrect information by other Web3 haters is totally cool, but in-depth explanations, or presentations summarizing years of work in Web3 to produce free helpful open source software, are silly and to be criticized without even engaging with the substance. Stop wasting my time.