4 ms·
> What it should not allow is for joe-random-domain.com to declare that the DoubleClick ad endpoints are first-party to them. But it lets Google declare that d
by maccard 4y ago
> What it should not allow is for joe-random-domain.com to declare that the DoubleClick ad endpoints are first-party to them.
But it lets Google declare that doubleclick is part of them.
- ikiris 4y agoYou mean the company that's been part of Google for near 20 years? Like I don't like tracking either, but this is kind of the point of the first party thing. They're clearly the same party.
- maccard 4y agoI do. This now means that double-click can treat my google.com cookies as first party cookies whwther I as a user want them to or not. I know that's the intention, and I'm not ok with that.
- shadowgovt 4y agoWhat tracking capability do you think treating DoubleClick cookies as first party on Google sites gives Google that they don't already have by just combining the logs from visits to google.com, youtube.com, etc., since all of those logs are stored in the same data warehouse and can be cross-compared?
- ahahahahah 4y agodoubleclick is part of them.