4 ms·

> Sure it's 77% smaller, it's also 77% worse. Hehe, yeah, imagine saying you made a new programming language with 77% less lines of code than Python.

• Zababa 3y ago
  Finally, an opportunity to share this https://nsl.com/papers/denial.html https://nsl.com/papers/denial.html
  • deleted 3y ago
    [deleted]
  • johnfn 3y ago
    I’m curious about the downvotes because I thought I was just agreeing with OP. Obviously lines of code in a programming language repo is no correlate at all to quality. It’s like the old adage about measuring aircraft quality by weight.
    • riwsky 3y ago
      That’s an inverse correlate, not no correlate
      • johnfn 3y ago
        No, a PL could have millions of lines of code and still not be very good. Consider any enterprise language that no one likes :)
  • barking_biscuit 3y ago
    I didn't get the punchline of this, so I asked GPT-4 to explain the punchline. Actually quite amusing.
    • IshKebab 3y ago
      From the context it presumably finds the maximum of an array in K. Also quite a nice demonstration of why K is a bad language. For writing maintainable software at least; for code golf it's clearly amazing! (And maybe interactive calculator style usage?)