3 ms·
Highly suggest sorting by date rather than size. Putting the smallest failures at the top causes a little bit of an optical illusion making the first tower appe
by fwlr 3y ago
Highly suggest sorting by date rather than size. Putting the smallest failures at the top causes a little bit of an optical illusion making the first tower appear smaller than it really is. It also highlights that whatever is happening here is drastically different than what happened in 2008 - here we have three “big bank” failures while 2008 had only one, but we have zero “little bank” failures while 2008 had hundreds.
- haldujai 3y agoThe difference is this is missing the biggest failures of 2008 (Lehman, Bear, Merrill) as well as Fannie, Freddie, AIG and TARP.
- jbverschoor 3y agoIndeed. Many factors make me distrust the author about his intentions and bias (great mongering)