4 ms·
The world is getting better (for many) but it's also getting weirder and crazier. Both can be true. I have this hypothesis that the weirdness and craziness is
by api 3y ago
The world is getting better (for many) but it's also getting weirder and crazier. Both can be true.
I have this hypothesis that the weirdness and craziness is a symptom of early stage post-scarcity. Scarcity constrains things. Without it we will just spread out across the state space of possibilities like an oil slick, doing all kinds of insane and crazy things for increasingly complex and bizarre reasons. The more resources we have the more the question ceases to be "why" and becomes "why not?"
I call this the singLOLarity hypothesis.
A real post-scarcity future won't look like Star Trek. It'll look a little more like Lexx.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lexx https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lexx
If we are ever visited by super-advanced aliens, they will be really weird. Maybe they really are flying around in pimped-out spaceships with multi-color neon running lights mutilating our cattle for the lulz. The question is not "why?" It's "why not?"
- eru 3y ago> The world is getting better (for many) but it's also getting weirder and crazier. Both can be true. Yes, that is true. I was taking your use of 'shitty timeline' to mean 'worse'. I'm not sure it makes sense to talk about post-scarcity as a monolith. To give an example: Lamborghinis are still very much scarce; but drinking water out of the tap is so cheap in developed countries that we are living in a post-scarcity society for that resource. (I specify 'drinking water', because for industrial or agricultural applications water is still very much a constrained resource.) Another example is Internet bandwidth for text-only browsing of eg Wikipedia: it's too cheap to matter. Internet bandwidth for watching Netflix isn't quite there yet.