5 ms·

>An instance of heat/cold record does not prove anything Nobody made such a claim. Who are you arguing with?

• quickthrower2 4y ago
  > 5C above the previous record in some places. "An instance of heat/cold record" > But I still have friends who don't believe it, or don't believe it's got anything to do with humans. "does not prove anything"
  • lordnacho 4y ago
    The least generous interpretation of that is that this one event ought to convince all my friends of AGW. Now somehow the climate change topic is an ongoing conversation with a heck of a lot of things said about it. You can't summarize it all in a comment, and in any case this is an introductory statement meant to take the reader to the main issue, which is how evidence is supposed to work. I would suggest a more generous interpretation is "evidence such as this has been piling up for quite some time and yet does not change minds".
  • Fricken 4y ago
    The keyword in your quote is "still". Because the writer's friends still don't believe it, it implies that this instance of heat is not a singular event, but the continuation of a trend. A trend that the writer's friends still do not believe merits concern.