10 ms·
> nuanced remarks of individuals such as LeCun and Marcus Literally guessed it from the title. > In no corner of industrial AI does anyone seem to care whethe
by Veedrac 3y ago
> nuanced remarks of individuals such as LeCun and Marcus
Literally guessed it from the title.
> In no corner of industrial AI does anyone seem to care whether such programs are going to achieve intelligence.
> [...later...]
> penned by a computer industry exec, ..., the authors make glib assertions about intelligence ... “The stakes could not be higher in training artificial general intelligence systems. AI is the first tool that convincingly replicates the unique capabilities of the human mind. ...”
Hmm emoji.
- throw310822 3y ago> In no corner of industrial AI does anyone seem to care whether such programs are going to achieve intelligence. I am also completely indifferent to whether a calculator can do arithmetic. I'm fine with it displaying the correct results.
- adamisom 3y agoTo me this comment means that, if people care about the results of "intelligence", then probably future computers will "do intelligence" to achieve that, just as calculators actually do do arithmetic.
- throw310822 3y agoThat's indeed what I meant.
- Robotbeat 3y ago> “AI is the first tool that convincingly replicates the unique capabilities of the human mind.” Isn’t… isn’t that literally the definition of term “artificial intelligence,” just rephrased?