5 ms·
Yet, glassdoor is still thriving. This is just a step forward for transparency.
by kennyloginz 3y ago
Yet, glassdoor is still thriving. This is just a step forward for transparency.
- s1artibartfast 3y agoBut the question remains: is it useful?
- clnq 3y agoYes. It's like a pseudo-union. Collectively bad companies are avoided and good ones receive more interest. Low salaries and bad managers are put on display. Good ones are, too. It's useful for the job seeker, and it's useful for society.
- isbvhodnvemrwvn 3y agoSome of the companies I worked for have removed my reviews, so I'm not so sure about that.
- clnq 3y agoYou're saying it is corruptible. But it doesn't have to be perfect to be useful. There's plenty of critical reviews on the platform. More than enough to take a peek into the problems some corps have before joining.
- charlieyu1 3y agoMore information is better than less information. A few more cases definitely are red flags.
- dghlsakjg 3y agoYep. I’ve used Glassdoor reviews in making my decision about employers. I ignored bad reviews once and regretted it.
- phendrenad2 3y agoNo. I've looked up companies that were great or awful, and the reviews looked about the same. A fee negative reviews from the janitor, and lots of positive reviews that look like they were written by the PR team.