3 ms·
It looks interesting, but I don't understand the syntax. The only documentation is a doctoral thesis, which contains the usual padding: > Interestingly, this b
by wizzwizz4 4y ago
It looks interesting, but I don't understand the syntax. The only documentation is a doctoral thesis, which contains the usual padding:
> Interestingly, this basic definition of map has been almost unchanged for 60 years since McCarthy first presented the definition of maplist in [62].
but it jumps from what looks like standard Haskell, to the new syntax, without explanation.
- 082349872349872 4y agotry https://www.egison.org/download/pmo-paper.pdf https://www.egison.org/download/pmo-paper.pdf ?
- wizzwizz4 4y agoThis comment originally said that the link was useless. Actually, this is a nearly-complete explanation of Egison's syntax. The only difference I've noticed so far is : for Egison's ::.
- 082349872349872 4y agoEdit: glad it helped! (This comment originally suggested attempting to reverse-engineer the syntax after learning the semantics)
- hyperhello 4y ago“Egison makes programming dramatically simple!”