4 ms·
They are not against monetization, you have made that leap. They are against AI replacing humans simply because it will be cheaper. Your comparison is flawed.
by lastangryman 3y ago
They are not against monetization, you have made that leap. They are against AI replacing humans simply because it will be cheaper. Your comparison is flawed.
- MichaelZuo 3y ago> They are not against monetization, you have made that leap. They are against AI replacing humans simply because it will be cheaper. Your comparison is flawed. If they are fine with more expensive AI replacing humans, instead of cheaper AI, then that seems to be an even more objectionable position? I doubt they have such bizarre views. But it’s possible the writer could have incoherent thoughts. For me, the most sensible reading is that they’re against any monetization of AI writing period. Not that they’re fine with AI writing if it’s beyond what most people can afford.
- beepbooptheory 3y ago> If they are fine with more expensive AI replacing humans, instead of cheaper AI, then that seems to be an even more objectionable position?..I doubt they have such bizarre views. But it’s possible the writer could have incoherent thoughts. I am not sure if you are being willfully obtuse, serious, or comedic here, but you made me smile either way, thank you.
- MichaelZuo 3y agoI was surprised and confused too, I hadn’t even considered the possibility!