4 ms·
You’re probably not using GPT-4, the internet is being flooded with takes about GPT-3.5’s quality like this simply because the author doesn’t know there is a me
by gfodor 3y ago
You’re probably not using GPT-4, the internet is being flooded with takes about GPT-3.5’s quality like this simply because the author doesn’t know there is a meaningful difference with the new model.
- assimpleaspossi 3y agoWhen I go here: https://openai.com/product/gpt-4 https://openai.com/product/gpt-4 it says "try on chatgpt plus" and sends me to the same page I log in with and that's where I've been testing it.
- sbohacek 3y agoBe sure that you select GPT-4 from the drop down list of models. For each new chat, it reverts back to default GPT-3.5.
- assimpleaspossi 3y agoI don't see any dropdowns for such a thing.
- pigeons 3y agoGPT-4 still confidently makes up sources for wrong answers and throws subtle mistakes (the obvious mistakes aren't as big a nuisance) into output. This isn't to say gpt-4 isn't cool or impressive or a development to watch and learn about and be excited about, but I frequently see criticism dismissed as "you must be using 3.5" while I find 4 still costs more time than it would have potentially saved.
- gfodor 3y agoOf course this is possible but usually criticizing a dismissal like this as being wrong comes after it has been proven wrong.
- jacquesm 3y agoIf GPT-X would just shut up if it doesn't know something it would already be 10x more useful than it is right now.
- gedy 3y agoIsn't that the core issue? Its model doesn't really "know" what is real or made up.