4 ms·
Good point, the depth first search algorithm is a bit lack luster for this case: 1 -> .1 2 -> .01 3 -> .001 4 -> .0001 5 -> .00001 6 -> .000001 . -> .0∞1 I wou
by smac__ 3y ago
Good point, the depth first search algorithm is a bit lack luster for this case:
1 -> .1
2 -> .01
3 -> .001
4 -> .0001
5 -> .00001
6 -> .000001
. -> .0∞1
I would definitely recommend not judging the quality of the video based upon the quality of my reasoning in the experiment.
- neonskies 3y ago> 1 -> .1 2 -> .01 3 -> .001 4 -> .0001 5 -> .00001 6 -> .000001 . -> .0∞1 That would only count the rationals which you can definitely count off a carefully arranged matrix of rationals. But reals = rationals and irrationals and the irrationals are uncountable.
- smac__ 3y agoYou are definitely right, I missed quite a few numbers in this set. (Thank you!)