3 ms·

And couldn’t they already do it over the internet? Presumably they mean doctors can have an internet connection in remote places. But that’s not the same as be

And couldn’t they already do it over the internet? Presumably they mean doctors can have an internet connection in remote places. But that’s not the same as being far from their patient.

lupire 4y ago
Not in remote unwired terrain. Examples for "wireless" (roadless) transport of physical packets https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zipline_(drone_delivery_company)#:~:text=The%20company's%20drones%20deliver%20whole,of%20Kigali%20use%20Zipline%20drones https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zipline_(drone_delivery_comp....
- dx034 4y ago
  In remote areas, Starlink is probably a better bet than 5G to allow for low latency, high bandwidth use cases.
  - hgsgm 4y ago
    This arbitrary web site disagrees: 25ms vs 1ms latency. https://history-computer.com/starlink-vs-5g-which-is-better https://history-computer.com/starlink-vs-5g-which-is-better
    - dx034 4y ago
      but which really remote area gives you 5G with 1ms latency? If it's worth to have that infrastructure you might as well have fiber at home.