4 ms·
There's always doas[1] if you want a simpler, safer version. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doas https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doas
by zimpenfish 4y ago
There's always doas[1] if you want a simpler, safer version.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doas https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doas
- Gigachad 4y agoStill written in an insecure language.
- johnisgood 4y agoLord... name checks out though.
- jmclnx 4y agoNo such thing as an insecure language, only insecure programmers.
- Gigachad 4y agoImagine applying that same line of logic to any other kind of safety. "Airbags are pointless, just don't crash" The reality is that all programmers are insecure programmers. The ones arrogant enough to think they are not insecure are the most dangerous.
- zimpenfish 4y ago> The ones arrogant enough to think they are not insecure To be fair, I think the OpenBSD people have demonstrated they're pretty capable at writing decently secure software in C.